Skip to main content

Table 1 Parameters in the site analysis, branch and branch-site analyses ofNADP-ME-A

From:Identification and evolution of C4photosynthetic pathway genes in plants

Test Used Foregroud branches Model ω LnL Estimates of parameters df P Positively selected sites under BEB
Site analysis M0:(one-ratio) 0.091 −27,294.09 ω = 0.091
M3:(discrete) 0.117 −26,141.38 p0 = 0.601ω0 = 0.019 4 0.000(M0 vs M3)
p1 = 0.360 ω1 = 0.175
p2 = 0.039 ω2 = 1.091
Branch analysis M0 −27,294.09 ω = 0.091
a1 −27,286.99 ω0 = 0.092 ω1 = 0.006 1 < 0.001
a2 −27,287.52 ω0 = 0.092 ω1 = 0.016 1 < 0.001
a3 −27,285.91 ω0 = 0.092 ω1 = 0.018 1 < 0.001
a4 −27,292.69 ω0 = 0.090 ω1 = 0.314 1 0.095
a5 −27,294.06 ω0 = 0.091 ω1 = 0.085 1 0.827
a6 −27,293.33 ω0 = 0.090 ω1 = 0.358 1 0.218
a7 −27,292.88 ω0 = 0.090 ω1 = 0.158 1 0.121
Branch-site analysis M1 −26,625.07 p0 = 0.915 p1 = 0.085
a1 Model A −26,616.55 p0 = 0.871 p1 = 0.079(p2a + p2b = 0.050) 2 0.0002 (ModelA vs M1) Prob > 0.6 (178 M, 188Q, 193D, 326E, 330 L, 344 V, 345S, 375 L)
ω2 = 37.078
a2 Model A −26,622.12 p0 = 0.897 p1 = 0.081 (p2a + p2b = 0.002) 2 0.0520 (ModelA vs M1) Prob > 0.6 (11 L, 63Da, 94H, 110R, 344 V)
ω2 = 8.513
a3 Model A −26,610.43 p0 = 0.861 p1 = 0.080 (p2a + p2b = 0.058) 2 <  0.0001 (ModelA vs M1) Prob > 0.6 (11 L, 54Ra, 66Qb, 180 Ma, 188Q, 200Aa, 248P, 273Rb, 274Ia, 275 T, 298 V, 344 V, 367 K, 389S)
ω2 = 152.141
a4 Model A −26,624.28 p0 = 0.801 p1 = 0.074 (p2a + p2b = 0.11) 2 0.4525 (ModelA vs M1) Prob > 0.6 (122 V, 174A, 185 M, 220R, 268A)
ω2 = 1.000
a5 Model A −26,619.18 p0 = 0.902 p1 = 0.083 (p2a + p2b = 0.015) 2 0.0028 (ModelA vs M1) Prob > 0.6(94Ha, 182A, 196Ha, 269E)
ω2 = 11.724
a6 Model A −26,625.07 p0 = 0.915 p1 = 0.085 (p2a + p2b = 0.000) 2 1.0000 (ModelA vs M1) Prob > 0.6 (13H, 201H)
ω2 = 3.081
a7 Model A −26,625.07 p0 = 0.915 p1 = 0.085 (p2a + p2b = 0.000) 2 1.0000 (ModelA vs M1) Prob > 0.6 (33 K, 56 L)
ω2 = 1.000
  1. aPosterior probability > 95%
  2. bPosterior probability > 99%